• Respiratory care · Aug 2021

    Prediction of Extubation Failure in COVID-19.

    • Andrade FilhoPedro H dePHAnesthesiology Department, São Paulo- Hospital do Servidor Publico Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil.Postgraduate Program in Anesthesiology, Surgical Sciences, and Perioperative Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Pau, BrasilEduardo S de AssisESAAnesthesiology Department, São Paulo- Hospital do Servidor Publico Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil., Ladyer G Costa, Daniel Escóssia M Sousa, Talison S Pereira, and João Manoel Silva.
    • Anesthesiology Department, São Paulo- Hospital do Servidor Publico Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil.
    • Respir Care. 2021 Aug 1; 66 (8): 132313291323-1329.

    Background[Formula: see text] may be a reliable noninvasive alternative to the [Formula: see text] index. Furthermore, the ROX index (ie, the ratio of [Formula: see text] to breathing frequency) has been validated to predict high-flow nasal cannula failure in subjects under spontaneous breathing. However, these indices have not been tested in subjects with COVID-19 receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. This study aims to verify the correlation between both the ROX index and [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] and the ratio of [Formula: see text] to breathing frequency, and to determine the accuracy of the indices that use [Formula: see text] for the prediction of extubation failure in subjects with COVID-19.MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted from May 15, 2020, to June 15, 2020, with subjects with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation. Indices using [Formula: see text] in the formula were compared to those using [Formula: see text]. Additionally, the performance of the indices in predicting extubation failure was evaluated.ResultsThis study included 69 subjects age 64.8 ± 14.6 y. There were no differences between the median values of the indices, including between the ROX index and [Formula: see text] to breathing frequency (P = .40) or between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] (P = .83). When comparing the ROX index with the [Formula: see text] index to breathing frequency, they were found to be strongly correlated (R2 = 0.75 [95% CI 0.6763-0.8152], P < .001). The comparison of [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] revealed R2 = 0.70 (95% CI 0.563-0.749, P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ROX index to determine extubation failure was 0.74 (P = .01), whereas for [Formula: see text] it was 0.78 (P < .001).ConclusionsThe indices presented a good correlation in subjects with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation, and both the ROX index and [Formula: see text] can discriminate extubation failure in this population.Copyright © 2021 by Daedalus Enterprises.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…