• BJOG · Feb 2018

    The effectiveness of surgical interventions for women with FGM/C: a systematic review.

    • R C Berg, S Taraldsen, M A Said, I K Sørbye, and S Vangen.
    • Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
    • BJOG. 2018 Feb 1; 125 (3): 278-287.

    BackgroundFemale genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) changes normal genital functionality and can cause complications. There is an increasing demand for treatment of FGM/C-related complications.ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review of empirical quantitative research on the outcomes of interventions for women with FGM/C-related complications.Search StrategyA search specialist searched 16 electronic databases.Selection CriteriaSelection was performed independently by two researchers. We accepted quantitative studies that examined the outcome of an intervention for an FGM/C-related concern.Data Collection And AnalysisWe extracted data into a pre-designed form, calculated effect estimates, and performed meta-analyses.Main ResultsWe included 62 studies (5829 women), which investigated the effect of defibulation, excision of cysts, and clitoral reconstruction. Meta-analyses of defibulation versus no defibulation showed a significantly lower risk of caesarean section (relative risk, RR: 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI: 0.25-0.45) and perineal tears with defibulation: second-degree tear (RR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24-0.79), third-degree tear (RR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.05-0.94), fourth-degree tear (RR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.41). The meta-analyses detected no significant differences in obstetric outcomes of antenatal versus intrapartum defibulation. Except for one study, none of the studies on the excision of cysts indicated any complications, and the results were deemed favourable. Reconstructive surgery resulted in a visible clitoris in about 77% of women. Most women self-reported improvements in their sexual life, but up to 22% experienced a worsening in sexuality-related outcomes after reconstruction.ConclusionsWomen with FGM/C who seek therapeutic surgery should be informed about the scarcity of evidence for benefits and the potential harms of the available procedures.Tweetable AbstractSystematic review shows defibulation after FGM/C has obstetric benefits; effect of reconstruction is uncertain.© 2017 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.