• Stefanie Beck, Dennis Hoop, Haissam Ragab, Cornelius Rademacher, Aurelie Meßner-Schmitt, Franziska von Breunig, Alexander Haese, Markus Graefen, Christian Zöllner, and Marlene Fischer.
• Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
• Int J Med Robot. 2020 Jun 1; 16 (3): e2094.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the incidence of early postoperative delirium in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the extreme Trendelenburg position and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) in supine position.MethodsPatients were screened for delirium signs 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes following extubation.ResultsPACU delirium was present in 39.3% of RARP (64/163) patients and 41.8% of ORP (77/184) patients. Higher age (OR 1.072, 95%CI: 1.034-1.111, P < .001), total intravenous anesthesia (OR 2.001, 95%CI: 1.243-3.221, P = .004), and anesthesia duration (OR 1.255, 95%CI: 1.067-1.476, P = .006) were associated with PACU delirium, but no association was found between surgical technique and PACU delirium.ConclusionCompared with inhalational anesthesia, total intravenous anesthesia using propofol-sufentanil, higher age, and longer duration of anesthesia were associated with PACU delirium. Based on these findings, adverse effects on postoperative recovery and delirium signs do not have to be considered in the choice of surgical approach for radical prostatectomy.Trial Registrationhttps://www.drks.de/, identifier: DRKS00010014.© 2020 The Authors. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

17 keywords...

hide…