• A H Ilsley, J D Hart, R T Withers, and J G Roberts.
• Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Flinders Medical Center, Bedford Park, South Australia.
• J Clin Monit. 1993 Jul 1; 9 (3): 196-201.

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of five rotating vane or turbine-type respirometers--fdE Magtrak Respiratory Monitor, fdE Haloscale Standard Wright Respirometer, Micro-Medical Pocket Monitor II, and Ohmeda 5400 and 5410 Volume Monitors--which are marketed as suitable for measuring expired gas volume in anesthetized adult patients.MethodsThe devices were tested for accuracy at simulated minute ventilations ranging from 2.4 to 15 L/min with three gas mixtures: air, air saturated with water vapor, and N2O/O2 (70:30).ResultsIn the usual range for adult minute ventilation during general anesthesia with intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (5-12 L/min), all devices were on average accurate to within 12%. At the lowest minute volume readings (2.4 L/min) all devices except the Pocket Monitor tended to have low readings. No significant differences in readings were introduced by either saturation with water vapor or introduction of 70% N2O, except with ventilation below 4 L/min with both Ohmeda respirometers.ConclusionsAll monitors showed reasonable clinical accuracy in the usual adult minute ventilation range during general anesthesia with intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (> 5 L/min) when used to measure air, water vapor-saturated air, or N2O/O2 mixtures.

12 keywords...

hide…