• Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med · Aug 2019

    Augmented renal clearance in critically ill trauma patients: A pathophysiologic approach using renal vascular index.

    • Cedric Carrie, Alexandre Lannou, Sebastien Rubin, Hugues De Courson, Laurent Petit, and Matthieu Biais.
    • Anaesthesiology and critical care department, CHU de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: cedric.carrie@chu-bordeaux.fr.
    • Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019 Aug 1; 38 (4): 371-375.

    BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to explore the relationship between creatinine clearance (ClCr), cardiac index (CI) and renal vascular index (RVI) in order to assess the potential mechanisms driving ARC in critically ill trauma patient. The secondary objective was to assess the performance of RVI for prediction of ARC.MethodsEvery trauma patient who underwent cardiac and renal ultrasound measurements during their initial ICU management was retrospectively reviewed over a 3-month period. ARC was defined by a 24-hr measured ClCr ≥ 130 mL/min/1.73m2. A mixed effect model was constructed to explore covariates associated with ClCr over time. The performance of RVI for prediction of ARC was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and compared to the ARCTIC (ARC in trauma intensive care) predictive scoring model.ResultsThirty patients, contributing for 121 coupled physiologic data, were retrospectively analysed. There was a significant correlation between ClCr values and RVI (r = -0.495; P = 0.005) but not between ClCr and CI values (r = 0.023; P = 0.967) at day 1. Using a mixed effect model, only age remained associated with ClCr variations over time. The area under the ROC curve of RVI for predicting ARC was 0.742 (95% CI: 0.649-0.834; P < 0.0001), with statistical difference when compared to the ROC curve of ARCTIC [0.842 (0.771-0.913); P < 0.0001].ConclusionUltrasonic evaluation of CI and RVI did not allow approaching the haemodynamic mechanisms responsible for ARC in patients. RVI was inaccurate and not better than clinical score for predicting ARC.Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…