-
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. · Jun 2015
Review Case ReportsA nephrology guide to reading and using systematic reviews of randomized trials.
- Sunil V Badve, Suetonia C Palmer, David W Johnson, and Giovanni F M Strippoli.
- Department of Nephrology, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
- Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2015 Jun 1; 30 (6): 878-84.
AbstractConscientious integration of the best available evidence in the care of an individual patient could be challenging for a busy clinician. A well-conducted systematic review can adequately inform not only the clinicians, but also the policy makers and researchers about the benefits and risks of a particular intervention. In this article, we describe how to critically appraise the methods and interpret the results of a systematic review of interventional trials and apply the findings of a systematic review to the clinical questions. © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..