• Neurosurgery · Sep 1992

    Comparative Study

    Severe head injury in children: experience of the Traumatic Coma Data Bank.

    • H S Levin, E F Aldrich, C Saydjari, H M Eisenberg, M A Foulkes, M Bellefleur, T G Luerssen, J A Jane, A Marmarou, and L F Marshall.
    • Division of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
    • Neurosurgery. 1992 Sep 1; 31 (3): 435-43; discussion 443-4.

    AbstractThe outcome at discharge, 6 months, and 1 year after they had sustained severe head injuries was investigated in children (0-15 yr old at injury) who were admitted to the neurosurgery service at one of four centers participating in the Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Of 103 eligible children, the quality of recovery was assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 6 months after injury in 92 patients (86% of series) and at 1 year in 82 patients (73% of series). The lowest post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupillary reactivity were predictive of the 6-month GOS as were their interaction. Analysis of the first computed tomographic scan disclosed that bilateral swelling with/without midline shift was related to a poor outcome as was the presence of mass lesions. Comparison of age-defined subgroups of patients revealed that outcome was poorest in the 0- to 4-year-old patients, as reflected by their mortality, which increased to 62% by 1 year. Distinctive features of the injuries in the 0- to 4-year-olds included evacuated subdural hematomas (20% of patients) and hypotension (32% of patients). The most favorable outcome was attained by 5- to 10-year-olds (2/3 had a good recovery by 1 yr), whereas the GOS distribution of adolescents was intermediate between the children and adults. In summary, the GOS data reflect heterogeneity in the quality of outcome after severe head injury depending on age, neurological indices, and computed tomographic scan diagnostic category.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…