-
Comparative Study
Optimization of wet radiofrequency ablation using a perfused-cooled electrode: a comparative study in ex vivo bovine livers.
- Jeong Min Lee, Joon Koo Han, Se Hyung Kim, Jae Young Lee, Kyung Sook Shin, Chang Jin Han, Min Woo Lee, Jun Il Choi, and Byung Ihn Choi.
- Department of Radiology, and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Korean J Radiol. 2004 Oct 1; 5 (4): 250-7.
ObjectiveTo determine the optimized protocol for wet monopolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using a perfused-cooled electrode to induce coagulation necrosis in the ex vivo bovine liver.Materials And MethodsRadiofrequency was applied to excised bovine livers in a monopolar mode using a 200W generator with an internally cooled electrode (groups A and B) or a perfused-cooled electrode (groups C, D, E, and F) at maximum power (150-200 W) for 10 minutes. A total of 60 ablation zones were created with six different regimens: group A-dry RFA using intra-electrode cooling; group B-dry RFA using intra-electrode cooling and a pulsing algorithm; group C-wet RFA using only interstitial hypertonic saline (HS) infusion; group D-wet RFA using interstitial HS infusion and a pulsing algorithm; group E-wet RFA using interstitial HS infusion and intra-electrode cooling; and group F-wet RFA using interstitial HS infusion, intra-electrode cooling and a pulsing algorithm. In groups C, D, E, and F, RFA was performed with the infusion of 6% HS through the perfused cooled electrode at a rate of 2 mL/minute. During RFA, we measured the tissue temperature at a distance of 15 mm from the electrode. The dimensions of the ablation zones and the changes in impedance, currents, and liver temperature during RFA were compared between these six groups.ResultsDuring RFA, the mean tissue impedances in groups A (243+/-88 ohm) and C (252.5+/-108 ohm) were significantly higher than those in groups B (85+/-18.7 ohm), D (108.2+/-85 ohm), E (70.0+/-16.3 ohm), and F (66.5+/-7 ohm) (p < 0.05). The mean currents in groups E and F were significantly higher than those in groups B and D, which were significantly higher than those in groups A and C (p < 0.05): 520+/-425 mA in group A, 1163+/-34 mA in group B, 652.5+/-418 mA in group C, 842.5+/-773 mA in group D, 1665+/-295 mA in group E, and 1830+/-109 mA in group F. The mean volumes of the ablation regions in groups E and F were significantly larger than those in the other groups (p < 0.05): 17.7+/-5.6 cm(3) in group A, 34.5+/-3.0 cm(3) in group B, 20.2+/-15.6 cm(3) in group C, 36.1+/-19.5 cm(3) in group D, 68.1+/-12.4 cm(3) in group E, and 79.5+/-31 cm(3) in group F. The final tissue temperatures at a distance of 15 mm from the electrode were higher in groups E and F than those in groups A, C, and D (p < 0.05): 50+/-7.5 degrees C in group A, 66+/-13.6 degrees C in group B, 60+/-13.4 degrees C in group C, 61+/-12.7 degrees C in group D, 78+/-14.2 degrees C in group E, and 79+/-12.0 degrees C in group F.ConclusionWet monopolar RFA, using intra-electrode cooling and interstitial saline infusion, showed better performance in creating a large ablation zone than either dry RFA or wet RFA without intra-electrode cooling.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.