• Paediatric anaesthesia · Aug 2021

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Tracheal intubation with or without a neuromuscular blocking agent for a short surgical procedure in children : Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.

    • Sujung Park, Ji-Ho Kim, BaeJae ChanJCDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang City, South Korea., Jeong-Rim Lee, and Min-Soo Kim.
    • Anaesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
    • Paediatr Anaesth. 2021 Aug 1; 31 (8): 863-870.

    BackgroundAlthough a neuromuscular blocking agent during induction of anesthesia is the standard of care in adults, some pediatric anesthesiologists remain concerned about their use for several reasons. Therefore, propofol and short-acting opioids with a moderate concentration of sevoflurane have been used as alternatives to a neuromuscular blocking agent.AimsThis study compared propofol, alfentanil, and rocuronium to determine the optimal anesthetic agent for intubation conditions as well as emergence in a short pediatric procedure.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 114 pediatric patients, aged 1-9 years, were randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving either propofol 2 mg kg-1 (propofol group), alfentanil 14 mcg kg-1 (alfentanil group), or rocuronium 0.3 mg kg-1 (rocuronium group). The primary outcome was intubating conditions, which were evaluated 90 s after test drug administration. Vital signs were recorded during the intubation period. Complications during and after emergence, time to recovery, airway-related complications, and severity of emergence agitation were recorded.ResultsCompared with the propofol group (60%), significantly more excellent intubating conditions were observed in the alfentanil group (97%, percent difference -37, 95% confidence interval (CI) -54.4--21.0, p < .001) and the rocuronium group (87%, percent difference -27, 95% CI -46.5--8.2, p = .041). Hemodynamic responses were different between the rocuronium and alfentanil groups, although the incidence of adverse events was not different among the three groups. The emergence duration was only statistically different between the rocuronium group [9.9 ± 3.2 min] and the propofol group [11.7 ± 2.2 min] (difference 95% CI 0.667-3.583, p = .001), while that of the alfentanil group [10.9 ± 2.4 min] was comparable with the other groups.ConclusionsBoth 0.3 mg kg-1 rocuronium and 14 µg kg-1 alfentanil are superior adjuncts for tracheal intubation in children undergoing frenulectomy in comparison with 2 mg kg-1 propofol. Hemodynamic adverse events and recovery profiles were comparable among the three groups.© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.