• Brahmajee K Nallamothu, Paul A Taheri, William G Barsan, and Eric R Bates.
• Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. bnallamo@umich.edu
• Am. Heart J. 2006 Oct 1; 152 (4): 613-8.

AbstractMany cardiovascular experts have called for the creation of specialized myocardial infarction centers and networks in the United States analogous to the current model for major trauma. Patients suffering ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and trauma share an essential feature that makes the argument for regionalization persuasive: rapid triage and treatment by highly trained personnel improve survival in both conditions. Despite this similarity, however, the trauma system may be limited as a model for regionalizing STEMI care. First, the development of trauma systems has been hindered by the struggle for sufficient and stable funding, competing interests among individual stakeholders, and the overall lack of desire for state-sponsored healthcare planning in the United States. These same obstacles would need to be overcome if STEMI care is regionalized. Second, unique characteristics related to STEMI care, such as its varied clinical presentation and more lucrative reimbursement, will create new challenges. In this article, we briefly review the current status of trauma systems in the United States and describe why the regionalization of STEMI care may require different methods of healthcare organization.

11 keywords...

hide…