• Steven G Gabbe, Monica Hagan Vetter, Michelle C Nguyen, Susan Moffatt-Bruce, and Jeffrey M Fowler.
• Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: Steven.gabbe@osumc.edu.
• Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018 Sep 1; 219 (3): 303.e1-303.e6.

BackgroundWhile many studies have documented the high prevalence of burnout in practicing physicians and medical trainees, fewer reports describe burnout in academic leaders. In 2002, we observed a moderate-high to high level of burnout in 41.4% of chairs of academic departments of obstetrics and gynecology.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify trends in burnout and associated factors in today's obstetrics and gynecology chairs as they face complex changes to the current health care environment.Study DesignThis was a cross-sectional study. A survey was developed based on the questionnaire used in our first investigation and sent electronically to all members of the Council of University Chairs of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Burnout was measured using an abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Sciences Survey. In addition to demographic data, we assessed perceived stressors, job satisfaction, spousal/partner support, self-efficacy, depression, suicidal ideation, and stress management.ResultsThe response rate was 60% (84/139). Almost 30% of chairs were women, increased from 7.6% in 2002. Hospital and department budget deficits and loss of key faculty remain major stressors noted by participants. The Maslach Burnout Inventory results have changed dramatically over the past 15 years. Today's chairs demonstrated less burnout but with an "ineffective" profile. Subscale scores for emotional exhaustion and depersonalization were reduced but >50% reported low personal accomplishment. Spousal support remained important in preventing burnout.ConclusionChairs of academic departments of obstetrics and gynecology continue to face significant job-related stress. Burnout has decreased; however, personal accomplishment scores have also declined most likely due to administrative factors that are beyond the chairs' perceived control.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

33 keywords...

hide…