-
- Pavel Antiperovitch, Lorne Gula, and Sarah Blissett.
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: pavel.antiperovitch@lhsc.on.ca.
- Can J Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1; 37 (10): 1644-1647.
AbstractAlthough electrocardiography (ECG) is a fundamental skill for most physicians, trainees have poor diagnostic performance when interpreting ECGs. In this study, we examine a strategy to improve learning ECG interpretation: self-generation of diagnoses during online practice. We randomly assigned medical students and residents to one of 2 ECG interpretation training formats: multiple-choice (MCQ) or self-generation (SG) format, where participants free-text type their diagnosis aided by an autocomplete feature. The training phase consisted of 30 ECGs, after which participants completed an immediate post test and delayed post test (3-4 weeks later). Forty-eight participants completed the training module, 45 completed the immediate post test, and 27 completed the delayed post test. Participants assigned to the SG format scored higher on the immediate post test compared with those who practiced with the MCQ format, with a large effect size (78% vs 57%; d = 0.94; P = 0.02). There was a trend favouring SG on the delayed post test, with a moderate effect size (67% vs 56%; d = 0.65; P = 0.09). However, only 60% of participants completed the delayed post test, which hindered the detection of a statistically significant difference. The SG group made the correct primary diagnosis at a faster rate (32 vs 56 seconds; P < 0.001) but had a lower detection of secondary diagnoses (22 vs 42%; P = 0.007). Practicing ECG interpretation using self-generation of diagnoses improved immediate post test performance and fluency. Replication in other contexts and with other populations is required to confirm our findings and to further study retention.Copyright © 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.