• B Tomasco, A Cappiello, R Fiorilli, A Leccese, R Lupino, A Romiti, and U F Tesler.
• Divisione di Cardiochirurgia, Ospedale San Carlo, Potenza.
• G Ital Cardiol. 1995 Mar 1; 25 (3): 269-80.

ObjectivesA retrospective analysis of 444 patients (Pts) with acute coronary insufficiency (A.C.I.) submitted to coronary artery bypass grafting between January '85 and December '92 was performed in order to identify incremental risk factors associated with perioperative mortality and to evaluate whether prediction of mortality can be accomplished utilizing risk models specifically linked to the severity of myocardial ischemia.MethodsBased on clinical and ECGraphic standpoints three different groups were identified: urgent group, comprehensive of 257 Pts. in whom, because of full medically controlled ischemia, myocardial revascularization could be delayed until to 24-48 hours. Emergency-A group, comprehensive of 127 Pts with recurrent ischemia despite medical therapy, but with no signs of coronary insufficiency at the time of institution of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Emergency-B group, comprehensive of 60 Pts operated on after a mean preoperative ischemic interval of 3.9 +/- 2.4 hours who presented unrelenting signs of ischemia, either persisting since the inception of the clinical picture or lasting for over 30 minutes at the time of institution of CPB; among those, 27 Pts were in cardiogenic shock.ResultsMortality rate in the three groups was respectively: 7.4%, 13.4%, 31.7%. Multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors of in-hospital mortality: urgent group: aortic cross-clamping time (A.C.C.T.) (p = 0.10) and ejection fraction (E.F.) (p = 0.023). Emergency-A group: A.C.C.T. (p = 0.017), E.F. (p = 0.023) and non-use of blood cardioplegia (B.C.) (p = 0.04). Emergency-B group: cardiogenic shock (p = 0.00), preoperative ischemic interval > 6 hours (p = 0.00), A.C.C.T. (p = 0.018) and non-use of B.C. (p = 0.012).ConclusionsA useful stratification of Pts with A.C.I. in three different groups, each with its own risk model, can be obtained by means of clinical-ECGraphic criteria alone. Different prognostic weights can be attributed to the variables A.C.C.T., E.F. and non-use of B.C. depending on clinical status. A significant reduction of mortality rate in Pts with cardiogenic shock can be achieved by the utilization of individually-tailored surgical management.

23 keywords...

hide…