-
- Christian Wegmann, Roman Pfister, Steffen Scholz, Anne Markhof, Sebastian Wanke, Kathrin Kuhr, Tanja Rudolph, Stephan Baldus, and Hannes Reuter.
- Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Klinik III für Innere Medizin, Herzzentrum der Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
- Herz. 2015 Dec 1; 40 (8): 1107-14.
BackgroundIn contemporary practice with early catheterization in most patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction, the clinical utility of new or presumably new left bundle branch block (LBBB) as a diagnostic criterion equivalent to ST-segment elevation is not well established. This study therefore aimed to determine the predictive value of LBBB for the diagnosis of acute transmural myocardial infarction (or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI).Patients And MethodsBetween November 2006 and December 2011, 1,139 consecutive patients presenting to the heart center of the University of Cologne with suspected STEMI were examined. Of these patients, 935 presented with ST elevation, 72 with LBBB, and 132 had neither of these ECG changes. The diagnosis was confirmed with immediate coronary angiography.ResultsCompared with ST-segment elevation, LBBB was associated with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and end-organ damage, and more patients with LBBB presented with pulmonary edema or cardiogenic shock (Killip III/IV). STEMI was confirmed in 58.3 % of patients with LBBB and in 86.4 % with ST-segment elevation. The sensitivity (0.38 [0.29-0.46]; odds ratio: 1.24) and specificity (0.67 [0.58-0.77]) of LBBB for the prediction of STEMI were low. However, the additional assessment of troponin T (> 0.1 µg/l) increased the predictive value of LBBB significantly. After adjusting for age and gender, no difference in mortality was found between the groups.ConclusionLBBB with acute chest pain characterizes a cohort of patients with high morbidity and mortality. For the triage of these patients at first contact, additional criteria should be evaluated, which could increase the specificity of LBBB for the diagnosis of STEMI.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.