• Nina R O'Connor, Paul Junker, Scott M Appel, Robert L Stetson, Jeffrey Rohrbach, and Salimah H Meghani.
• 1 Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
• Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Jul 1; 35 (7): 966-971.

BackgroundHospitals are under increasing pressure to manage costs across multiple episodes of care. Most studies of the financial impact of palliative care have focused on costs during a single hospitalization.ObjectiveTo compare future acute health-care costs and utilization between patients who received inpatient palliative care consultation for goals of care (Palliative Care Service [PCS]) and a propensity-matched cohort of patients who did not receive palliative care consultation (non-PCS) in a single academic medical center.MethodsData were extracted from the hospital's electronic records for admissions and discharges between July 2014 and October 2016. A stratified propensity score matching was used to account for nonrandom assignment and potential inherent differences between PCS and non-PCS groups using variables of theoretical interest: age, gender, race, diagnosis, risk of mortality, and prior acute care costs.ResultsThe analytical sample for this study included 41 363 patients (PCS = 1853; non-PCS = 39 510). Future acute care costs were significantly higher in the non-PCS group after propensity score matching (highest tier = US$15 654 vs US$8831; second highest tier = US$12 200 vs US$5496; P = .0001). The non-PCS group also had significantly higher future acute care utilization across all propensity tiers and outcomes including 30-day readmission ( P = .0001), number of future hospital days ( P = .0001), and number of future intensive care unit days ( P = .0001).ConclusionPalliative care consultations for goals of care may decrease future health-care utilization with cost savings that persist into future hospitalizations.

26 keywords...

hide…