• Medicine · May 2021

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    An interventional study on the influence of social and family support systems on the fertility pattern of HIV-infected women.

    • Shaoping Chen, Yifang Ning, Yunhuan Tan, Xiaoli Lin, and Miao Wang.
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Secod Hospital Affiliated to Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
    • Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 21; 100 (20): e26027e26027.

    ObjectivesThis study was designed to explore the influence of social and family support system on the fertility pattern of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women.Trial DesignAn interventional study including 70 participants.MethodsHIV-infected female participants treated from January 2015 to January 2019 were selected, randomly divided into 2 groups, with 35cases in each group. The experimental group was given complete social and family support, whereas the control group was given basic treatment only. Changes in fertility rate, fertility number, and fertility interval were compared between the 2 groups. We also compared the changes in the quality of life (QOL), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) of the 2 groups of participants.ResultsThe fertility rate of the experimental group was 43.29%, and that of in the control group was 31.96%, and the childbearing age is mainly concentrated in the 20 to 29 years; the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). The mean number of births in the experimental group was (1.47 ± 0.61), which was significantly higher than that of in the control group (0.63 ± 0.22), and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). The fertility interval of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of in the control group (2.65 ± 1.34 vs 3.77 ± 0.85), and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). Before the intervention, there were no significant differences in the QOL scores, SAS, and SDS scores between the experimental group and the control group (P > 0.05). After intervention, the scores of QOL in the experimental group was significantly higher than those of in the control group (54.1 ± 1.7 vs 41.2 ± 2.5); the SAS and SDS scores of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of in the control group (39.3 ± 4.2 vs 56.1 ± 5.7; 32.2 ± 6.7 vs 51.9 ± 5.8), and the difference were statistically significant (P < .05).ConclusionsSocial and family support for female participants infected with HIV can improve the fertility rate of women to some extent, increase the number of births and shorten the interval between births, and can help relief the women's anxiety, depression, and other emotional problems, which is worthy of extensive application and promotion in the society.Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.