-
Comparative Study
Mechanisms of cardiomyoplasty: comparative effects of adynamic versus dynamic cardiomyoplasty.
- B D Mott, J H Oh, Y Misawa, J Helou, V Badhwar, D Francischelli, and R C Chiu.
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
- Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1998 Apr 1; 65 (4): 1039-44; discussion 1044-5.
BackgroundThe apparent paradox seen in patients who have undergone dynamic cardiomyoplasty and shown substantial clinical and functional improvements with only modest hemodynamic changes may be due to inappropriate end points chosen for study, a result of incomplete understanding of mechanisms involved. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative role of the passive "girdling effect" and the dynamic "systolic squeezing effect" of the wrapped muscle in cardiomyoplasty.MethodsThe control group of 6 dogs underwent 4 weeks of rapid pacing (250 beats/min) to induce severe heart failure followed by 8 weeks of observation without rapid pacing. The trajectory of recovery in hemodynamics and cardiac dimensions was followed with echocardiography and Swan-Ganz catheters. In the "adynamic" cardiomyoplasty group (n=4), the left latissimus dorsi muscle was wrapped around the ventricles and allowed to stabilize and mature for 4 weeks. This was followed by rapid pacing and recovery as in the control group. In the "dynamic" cardiomyoplasty group (n=3), the same protocol for the adynamic group was followed except that a synchronizable cardiomyostimulator was attached to the thoracodorsal nerve of the muscle wrap. This allowed the latter to be transformed during the rapid-pacing phase and permitted dynamic squeezing of the muscle wrap to be generated by burst stimulation synchronized with cardiac contraction in a 1:2 ratio.ResultsBaseline data were comparable in all groups prior to rapid pacing. After 4 weeks of rapid pacing, the left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in the adynamic (27.0%+/-3.9%; p < 0.05) and dynamic (33.3%+/-2.3%; p < 0.02) cardiomyoplasty groups compared with controls (18.8%+/-8.3%). Similarly, ventricular dilatation in both systole and diastole was less in the adynamic (51.8+/-8.7 mL, [p < 0.002] and 38.2+/-7.2 mL [p < 0.001], respectively) and dynamic (62.0+/-7.2 [p < 0.02] and 41.3+/-3.5 mL [p < 0.005], respectively) cardiomyoplasty groups compared with controls. In the dynamic group, on and off studies were carried out after cessation of rapid pacing while the heart was still in severe failure, and they demonstrated a systolic squeezing effect in stimulated beats. Only this group recovered fully to baseline after 8 weeks.ConclusionsBy reducing myocardial stress, both the passive girdling effect and the dynamic systolic squeezing effect have complementary roles in the mechanisms of dynamic cardiomyoplasty.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.