• Howard Zisser, Eric Renard, Boris Kovatchev, Claudio Cobelli, Angelo Avogaro, Revital Nimri, Lalo Magni, Bruce A Buckingham, H Peter Chase, Francis J Doyle, John Lum, Peter Calhoun, Craig Kollman, Eyal Dassau, Anne Farret, Jerome Place, Marc Breton, Stacey M Anderson, Chiara Dalla Man, Simone Del Favero, Daniela Bruttomesso, Alessio Filippi, Rachele Scotton, Moshe Phillip, Eran Atlas, Ido Muller, Shahar Miller, Chiara Toffanin, Davide Martino Raimondo, Giuseppe De Nicolao, Roy W Beck, and Control to Range Study Group.
• 1 Sansum Diabetes Research Institute , Santa Barbara, California.
• Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2014 Oct 1; 16 (10): 613-22.

BackgroundThe Control to Range Study was a multinational artificial pancreas study designed to assess the time spent in the hypo- and hyperglycemic ranges in adults and adolescents with type 1 diabetes while under closed-loop control. The controller attempted to keep the glucose ranges between 70 and 180 mg/dL. A set of prespecified metrics was used to measure safety.Research Design And MethodsWe studied 53 individuals for approximately 22 h each during clinical research center admissions. Plasma glucose level was measured every 15-30 min (YSI clinical laboratory analyzer instrument [YSI, Inc., Yellow Springs, OH]). During the admission, subjects received three mixed meals (1 g of carbohydrate/kg of body weight; 100 g maximum) with meal announcement and automated insulin dosing by the controller.ResultsFor adults, the mean of subjects' mean glucose levels was 159 mg/dL, and mean percentage of values 71-180 mg/dL was 66% overall (59% daytime and 82% overnight). For adolescents, the mean of subjects' mean glucose levels was 166 mg/dL, and mean percentage of values in range was 62% overall (53% daytime and 82% overnight). Whereas prespecified criteria for safety were satisfied by both groups, they were met at the individual level in adults only for combined daytime/nighttime and for isolated nighttime. Two adults and six adolescents failed to meet the daytime criterion, largely because of postmeal hyperglycemia, and another adolescent failed to meet the nighttime criterion.ConclusionsThe control-to-range system performed as expected: faring better overnight than during the day and performing with variability between patients even after individualization based on patients' prior settings. The system had difficulty preventing postmeal excursions above target range.

39 keywords...

hide…