• Brent A Dunworth, Warren S Sandberg, Suzanne Morrison, Calvin Lutz, Jonathan P Wanderer, and John M O'Donnell.
• is assistant professor of clinical anesthesiology and director of advanced practice and chief of the Nurse Anesthesia Division, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
• AANA J. 2018 Aug 1; 86 (4): 269-277.

AbstractResidual neuromuscular blockade creates excess perioperative morbidity. Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring devices may help ensure full recovery from neuromuscular blocking agents and have been demonstrated to reduce complications associated with residual neuromuscular blockade. We studied the effectiveness of educational efforts to introduce quantitative monitoring at a large academic medical center, with predefined main outcome measures of self-reported familiarity with use of the device and actual device uptake. Anonymous surveys of knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward the devices were administered before and after the education effort. Monitor use rates were quantitatively assessed through data entry into the electronic medical record. Before-and-after results were compared by run charts, unpaired t tests (correcting for multiple comparisons), and examination of 99% confidence intervals. Users agreed that residual blockade was an important topic before and after education, and reported improvement in their ability to use the devices after education. Clinical utilization of the monitors increased from 23% to 40% of eligible cases, with the increased rate sustained in the follow-up period. Education, assessed as improved self-reported proficiency, was associated with measurable increases in utilization of new technology. However, the rate of uptake, even when applied to a problem the users agreed was important, was modest.Copyright© by the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists.

14 keywords...

hide…