-
Minerva anestesiologica · Mar 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Clinical and neuropsychologic evaluation of different anesthesia techniques (propofol vs isoflurane) in general surgery].
- C Launo, S Palermo, R Riello, M P Cammardella, and R Ughè.
- Cattedra di Terapia del Dolore, Università degli Studi di Genova.
- Minerva Anestesiol. 1994 Mar 1; 60 (3): 95-108.
AbstractDifferent anaesthetic techniques in the perioperative period (induction and maintenance of anesthesia, recovery and 48 postoperative hours) were evaluated in 200 patients undergoing general surgery. After randomization, results from 4 groups, were clinically and statistically compared according to the anesthetic techniques performed (propofol + fentanyl in air/O2; isoflurane + fentanyl in air/O2; propofol + fentanyl in N2O/O2; isoflurane in N2O/O2). The results show that anesthesia without N2O is difficult and fentanyl isn't the ideal analgesic; but no difference was found between the anesthetic techniques in quality of induction and maintenance, speed of recovery and quality of postoperative period.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..