• Alice Gray, Mark Pickering, and Stephen Sturman.
• Christian Medical Fellowship, London, UK and specialist registrar in palliative medicine, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
• Clin Med (Lond). 2021 May 1; 21 (3): 235237235-237.

AbstractSince 2018, there has been no requirement to bring decisions about the withdrawal of clinically-assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with persistent disorders of consciousness before the courts, providing that the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) are fulfilled. Subsequent British Medical Association and Royal College of Physicians guidance on CANH withdrawal recommended standards of record keeping and internal and external audit to ensure local decision making was compliant with the MCA to safeguard patients. The scope of the guidance also included patients with stroke and neurodegenerative disorders.Freedom of Information requests made 2 years after the introduction of this guidance have shown that none of the NHS trusts or clinical commissioning groups who responded were undertaking any systematic monitoring of these decisions. Neither is the Care Quality Commission reviewing these decisions, as there is 'no statutory requirement' to do so. It appears there is a lack of organised scrutiny of these highly complex life-ending treatment decisions. This omission must surely be a cause for concern.© Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

8 keywords...

hide…