• Spine J · Mar 2018

    Traumatic subaxial cervical facet subluxation and dislocation: epidemiology, radiographic analyses, and risk factors for spinal cord injury.

    • Ryan D Quarrington, Claire F Jones, Petar Tcherveniakov, Jillian M Clark, Sandler Simon J I SJI The Spinal Injuries Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, SA, Australia., Yu Chao Lee, Shabnam Torabiardakani, John J Costi, and Freeman Brian J C BJC Centre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, 30 Frome Rd, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Adelaide C.
    • School of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Centre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, 30 Frome Rd, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Adelaide Centre for Spinal Research, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Electronic address: ryan.quarrington@gmail.com.
    • Spine J. 2018 Mar 1; 18 (3): 387-398.

    Background ContextDistractive flexion injuries (DFIs) of the subaxial cervical spine are major contributors to spinal cord injury (SCI). Prompt assessment and early intervention of DFIs associated with SCI are crucial to optimize patient outcome; however, neurologic examination of patients with subaxial cervical injury is often difficult, as patients commonly present with reduced levels of consciousness. Therefore, it is important to establish potential associations between injury epidemiology and radiographic features, and neurologic involvement.PurposeThe aims of this study were to describe the epidemiology and radiographic features of DFIs presenting to a major Australian tertiary hospital and to identify those factors predictive of SCI. The agreement and repeatability of radiographic measures of DFI severity were also investigated.Study Design/SettingThis is a combined retrospective case-control and reliability-agreement study.Patient SampleTwo hundred twenty-six patients (median age 40 years [interquartile range = 34]; 72.1% male) who presented with a DFI of the subaxial cervical spine between 2003 and 2013 were reviewed.Outcome MeasuresThe epidemiology and radiographic features of DFI, and risk factors for SCI were identified. Inter- and intraobserver agreement of radiographic measurements was evaluated.MethodsMedical records, radiographs, and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans were examined, and the presence of SCI was evaluated. Radiographic images were analyzed by two consultant spinal surgeons, and the degree of vertebral translation, facet apposition, spinal canal occlusion, and spinal cord compression were documented. Multivariable logistic regression models identified epidemiology and radiographic features predictive of SCI. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) examined inter- and intraobserver agreement of radiographic measurements.ResultsThe majority of patients (56.2%) sustained a unilateral (51.2%) or a bilateral facet (48.8%) dislocation. The C6-C7 vertebral level was most commonly involved (38.5%). Younger adults were over-represented among motor-vehicle accidents, whereas falls contributed to a majority of DFIs sustained by older adults. Greater vertebral translation, together with lower facet apposition, distinguished facet dislocation from subluxation. Dislocation, bilateral facet injury, reduced Glasgow Coma Scale, spinal canal occlusion, and spinal cord compression were predictive of neurologic deficit. Radiographic measurements demonstrated at least a "moderate" agreement (ICC>0.4), with most demonstrating an "almost perfect" reproducibility.ConclusionsThis large-scale cohort investigation of DFIs in the cervical spine describes radiographic features that distinguish facet dislocation from subluxation, and associates highly reproducible anatomical and clinical indices to the occurrence of concomitant SCI.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…