• Christina Ma, Lauren E Riehm, Rachelle Bernacki, Joanna Paladino, and John J You.
• Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine (Ma, Riehm), Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Harvard Medical School (Bernacki, Paladino); Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care (Bernacki), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Ariadne Labs (Bernacki, Paladino), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Department of Medicine (Bernacki, Paladino), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass.; Division of General Internal and Hospitalist Medicine (You), Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont.; Departments of Medicine and of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (You), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
• CMAJ Open. 2020 Apr 1; 8 (2): E448-E454.

BackgroundSeriously ill patients in hospital have indicated that better communication with practitioners is vital for improving care. The aim of this study was to assess whether the quality of conversations about serious illness improved after implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program (SICP).MethodsIn this retrospective chart review study, we evaluated patients who were admitted to a medical ward at Hamilton General Hospital, had a stay of at least 48 hours, and were at risk for a lengthy stay or increased need for community-based services (inter-RAI Emergency Department Screener score of 5 or 6). The SICP study period was from Mar. 1, 2017, to Jan. 19, 2018. We used a validated codebook to assess the quality of documented conversations regarding serious illness for eligible patients before (usual care [control group]) and after SICP implementation (intervention group), specifically examining the following domains: patients' values and goals, understanding of prognosis and illness, end-of-life care planning, and code status or desire for other life-sustaining treatments.ResultsThe study sample included 56 patients in the control group and 56 patients in the intervention group. The overall quality of documented conversations about serious illness was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (p < 0.001) and was significantly higher in the subdomains of values and goals (p < 0.001), understanding of prognosis and illness (p < 0.001) and life-sustaining treatments (p = 0.03) but not end-of-life care planning (p = 0.48).InterpretationImplementation of the SICP in a hospital setting was associated with higher quality of documented conversations regarding serious illness with patients at high risk for clinical or functional deterioration. The SICP is transferable and adaptable to a hospital setting, and was associated with an increase in adherence to best practices compared to usual care.Copyright 2020, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

20 keywords...

hide…