• J Am Geriatr Soc · Aug 2021

    Multicenter Study Observational Study

    Variation in propofol induction doses administered to surgical patients over age 65.

    • Robert B Schonberger, Amit Bardia, Feng Dai, George Michel, David Yanez, Jeptha P Curtis, Michelle T Vaughn, Matthew M Burg, Michael Mathis, Sachin Kheterpal, Shamsuddin Akhtar, and Nirav Shah.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
    • J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Aug 1; 69 (8): 2195-2209.

    Background/ObjectivesAdvanced age is associated with increased susceptibility to acute adverse effects of propofol. The present study aimed to describe patterns of propofol dosing for induction of general anesthesia before endotracheal intubation in a nationwide sample of older adults presenting for surgery.DesignRetrospective observational study using the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group data set.SettingThirty-six institutions across the United States.ParticipantsA total of 350,766 patients aged over 65 years who received propofol for general anesthetic induction and endotracheal intubation between 2014 and 2018.InterventionNone.MeasurementsTotal induction bolus dose of propofol administered.ResultsThe mean (SD) weight-adjusted propofol dose was 1.7 (0.6) mg/kg. The mean prevalent propofol induction dose exceeded the upper bound of what has been described as the typical geriatric dose requirement across every age category examined. The percent of patients receiving propofol induction doses above the described typical geriatric range was 64.8% (95% CI 64.6-65.0), varying from 73.8% among patients aged 65-69 to 45.8% among patients aged 80 and older.ConclusionThe present study of a large multicenter cohort demonstrates that prevalent propofol dosing commonly falls above the published typically required dose range for patients aged ≥65 in nationwide anesthetic practice. Widespread variability in induction dose administration remains incompletely explained by known patient variables. The nature and clinical consequences of these unexplained dosing decisions remain important topics for further study. Observed discordance between expected and actual induction dosing raises the question of whether there should be reconsideration of widespread provider practice or, alternatively, whether what is published as the typical propofol induction dose range should be revisited.© 2021 The American Geriatrics Society.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…