• Katharina Staufer, Kevin Roedl, Danijel Kivaranovic, Andreas Drolz, Thomas Horvatits, Susanne Rasoul-Rockenschaub, Christian Zauner, Michael Trauner, and Valentin Fuhrmann.
• Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
• Liver Int. 2017 Jun 1; 37 (6): 843-850.

Background & AimsCurrent guidelines discourage renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill cirrhotics in the lack of liver transplant (LT) options. This study aimed to identify patients who benefit from RRT in the short and long-term.MethodsCritically ill cirrhotics were included over a time period of 6 years and followed for at least 1 year. CLIF-C ACLF, CLIF-SOFA, SOFA and MELD scores on admission, 24 h prior to RRT, 24 and 48 hours after start of RRT were analysed for their predictive value of ICU-mortality. Additionally, long-term renal recovery and successful bridging to LT was assessed.ResultsIn total, 40% (78/193) of patients required RRT. ICU-, 28 days-, 90 days-, and 1 year-mortality was 71%, 83%, 91%, and 92%, respectively, and was significantly higher than in patients without need for RRT (4%, 30%, 43%, and 50%), P<.001. CLIF-C ACLF and CLIF - SOFA scores within 24 hours prior to RRT showed good discriminant power to predict ICU-mortality. CLIF-C ACLF calculated 48 hours after commencing RRT was the most suitable predictor of ICU-mortality in RRT-patients irrespective of LT options (AUC: 0.866). In patients with ≥5 organ failure assessed by CLIF-SOFA at any time point showed 100% ICU-mortality. 13% of patients with RRT showed renal recovery; 14% of patients could be bridged to LT.ConclusionsMortality in critically ill cirrhotics with need for RRT is substantially high independent of LT options. Only a small proportion showed renal recovery after ICU discharge. CLIF-C ACLF and CLIF-SOFA score may assist in identifying patients who would not benefit from RRT.© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

31 keywords...

hide…