• Pacing Clin Electrophysiol · Apr 1988

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of the effects of right atrial, right ventricular apex and atrioventricular sequential pacing on myocardial oxygen consumption and cardiac efficiency: a laboratory investigation.

    • D Baller, H G Wolpers, J Zipfel, H J Bretschneider, and G Hellige.
    • Department of Experimental Cardiology, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Federal Republic of Germany.
    • Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Apr 1; 11 (4): 394-403.

    AbstractAs the impact of cardiac pacing on myocardial energetics has not yet been established, this laboratory investigation was undertaken to evaluate the effects of right atrial (AP), right ventricular apex (VP) and atrioventricular sequential pacing (AVP) on cardiac energetics in a closed-chest model. Ninety-two pacing interventions were performed in ten anesthetized mongrel dogs with normal loading conditions and contractile states. The energetic effects of pacing were assessed in terms of myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2), its hemodynamic determinants and cardiac efficiency. Efficiency was calculated as the ratio of O2-equivalent of external cardiac work to MVO2, using standard definitions. In the first series of experiments 36 intra-individual comparisons were made between AP and VP at identical rates (95-210 beats/min). In the second series AVP was compared to VP in 10 intra-individual comparisons at identical rates (109-190 beats/min). MVO2 was lower (p less than 0.001) during AP (8.30 +/- 2.14 ml O2/min.100 g) compared to VP (10.16 +/- 3.15 ml O2/min.100 g) at the same rate (158 +/- 32 beats/min). Efficiency (p less than 0.001) was considerably higher during AP (21.6 +/- 5.7%) compared to VP (12.8 +/- 5.9%). During AVP, MVO2 (10.85 +/- 1.76 ml O2/min.100 g) was not significantly different from VP (10.57 +/- 1.34 ml O2/min.100 g) at the same rate (146 +/- 25 beats/min). Hemodynamics were superior with AVP compared to VP. Efficiency was significantly higher (p less than 0.01) with sequential (15.4 +/- 3.9%) as compared to ventricular pacing (12.0 +/- 3.2%). In conclusion, this study indicated that VP exerts disadvantageous effects on MVO2 and cardiac efficiency. AP has beneficial effects on cardiac energetics because it improves the relationship between mechanical performance of the heart and its energy requirements. AVP results in a higher efficiency than VP due to superior hemodynamics, despite MVO2 levels comparable to those of VP. The mechanism of energy waste with right ventricular apex pacing is probably related to an asynchronous contraction in the ventricular myocardium due to a nonphysiological spread of excitation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.