• Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi · Jul 2012

    [Curative effect analysis of unsupported reduction ascending aortoplasty for dilatation of ascending aorta].

    • Yang Li, Wei Meng, and Eryong Zhang.
    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, PR China.
    • Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Jul 1; 26 (7): 819-22.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of unsupported reduction ascending aortoplasty for dilatation of the ascending aorta.MethodsBetween September 2005 and May 2011, 53 patients with aortic valve disease and dilatation of the ascending aorta underwent aortic valve replacement with unsupported reduction ascending aortoplasty. There were 41 males and 12 females, aged 22-75 years (mean, 52 years). The disease duration was 1 month to 14 years. The color Doppler echocardiography showed that the diameter of the ascending aorta before surgery was (45.9 +/- 3.3) mm; bicuspid aortic valve and tri-aortic valve were observed in 13 and 40 cases respectively. The heart functions were graded as II level in 19 cases, III level in 33 cases, and IV level in 1 case according to the standard of New York Heart Disease Academy (NYHA).ResultsAfter operation, mediastinum errhysis occurred in 1 case, pneumonia in 3 cases, and III degree atrioventricular block in 1 case. There was no related complication of the aortoplasty. All the patients were followed up 3-68 months (mean, 15 months), and had no obvious chest tightness and palpitation. At last follow-up, the NYHA heart functions were graded as I level in 22 cases, II level in 31 cases; the diameter of the ascending aorta was (35.2 +/- 4.0) mm, showing significant difference when compared with the preoperative one (P = 0.000), but no significant difference when compared with the one at discharge (34.0 +/- 2.5) mm (P = 0.245). There was significant difference in the diameter of the ascending aorta between last follow-up and preoperation, at discharge in the patients who were followed up more than 60 months (P < 0.05); significant difference was found between last follow-up and preoperation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (P < 0.05), but no significant difference between last follow-up and preoperation (P > 0.05) in patients whose diameter of the ascending aorta was more than 50 mm before operation.ConclusionUnsupported reduction ascending aortoplasty has good short- and mid-term results in treating aortic valve disease with mild to moderate dilatation (diameter range, 40-50 mm) of the ascending aorta. Inclusion criteria of the aortoplasty should be strict. Long-term results need further follow-up.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.