• Michelle C Williams, Alastair Moss, Marc Dweck, Amanda Hunter, Tania Pawade, Philip D Adamson, Shah Anoop S V ASV University of Edinburgh/British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK., Shirjel Alam, Christopher D Maroules, Edwin Jr van Beek, Ricardo Cury, Edward D Nicol, David E Newby, and Giles Roditi.
• University of Edinburgh/British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/imagingmedsci.
• J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Jan 1; 14 (1): 3-11.

ObjectivesTo assess the prognostic implications of standardized reporting systems for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and coronary artery calcium scores (CACS) in patients with stable chest pain.BackgroundThe Coronary Artery Disease Reporting And Data System (CAD-RADS) and Coronary Artery Calcium - Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS) aim to improve communication of CACS and CCTA results, but its influence on prognostication is unknown.MethodsImages from 1769 patients who underwent CCTA as part of the Scottish Computed Tomography of the HEART (SCOT-HEART) multi-center randomized controlled trial were assessed. CACS were classified as CAC-DRS 0 to 3 based on Agatston scores. CCTA were classified as CAD-RADS 0 to 5 based on the most clinically relevant finding per patient. The primary outcome was the five-year events of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction.ResultsPatients had a mean age of 58 ± 10 years and 56% were male. CAC-DRS 0, 1, 2 and 3 occurred in 642 (36%), 510 (29%), 239 (14%) and 379 (21%) patients respectively. CAD-RADS 0, 1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B and 5 occurred in 622 (35%), 327 (18%), 211 (12%), 165 (9%), 221 (12%), 42 (2%) and 181 (10%) patients respectively. Patients classified as CAC-DRS 3 were at an increased risk of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction compared to CAC-DRS 0 patients (hazard ratio (HR) 9.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.24, 27.31; p < 0.001). Patients with higher CAD-RADS categories were at an increased risk of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, with patients classified as CAD-RADS 4B at the highest risk compared to CAD-RADS 0 patients (HR 19.14; 95% CI 4.28, 85.53; p < 0.001).ConclusionPatients with higher CAC-DRS and CAD-RADS scores were at increased risk of subsequent fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction. This confirms that the classification provides additional prognostic discrimination for future coronary heart disease events.Copyright © 2020 [The Author/The Authors]. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

44 keywords...

hide…