-
- Feng-Chuan Lin, Hsin-Yu Chien, Yih-Chia Kao, and Chi-Te Wang.
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
- J Formos Med Assoc. 2022 Jan 1; 121 (1 Pt 2): 329-334.
Background/PurposeVoice therapy is frequently recommended as the first-line treatment for benign voice disorders. This study investigated the clinical effectiveness of voice therapy and the prognostic factors of treatment outcomes.MethodsWe recruited 103 consecutive patients with voice disorders, namely vocal nodules, polyps, and muscle tension dysphonia (MTD), from September 2014 to July 2016. All the patients received voice therapy as the primary treatment. Treatment outcomes were evaluated using auditory perceptual evaluation, acoustic analysis, maximum phonation time, and 10-item voice handicap index (VHI-10). Clinical effectiveness of voice therapy was defined by either 1) a posttreatment VHI-10 score ≤ 10 points or 2) decline of VHI-10 ≥ 4 points.ResultsAfter voice therapy, VHI-10 and perceptual rating of voice quality improved significantly (p < 0.05) in the three disease categories. In patients with nodules, all the outcome parameters improved significantly (p < 0.05). Patients with good adherence to voice therapy (attending more than four sessions) had a significantly higher effectiveness than those with poor adherence (87% vs. 64%, p < 0.05). Patients with high occupational vocal demand also demonstrated a better effectiveness than those with routine vocal demand (90% vs. 70%, p < 0.05). Subsequent multivariate analyses revealed that adherence and vocal demand were independently and significantly correlated with clinical effectiveness (p = 0.03).ConclusionVoice therapy is effective for patients with vocal nodules, polyps, and MTD. Adherence to voice therapy and occupational vocal demand are significant prognostic factors for treatment outcomes.Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.