-
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd · Jun 2005
Comment[Indicators as the basis for quality-control in the midwifery practice].
- L J Boomsma, P M Offerhaus, D O A Daemers, and S Flikweert.
- Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap, afd. Richtlijnontwikkeling, Utrecht. lboomsma@wanadoo.nl
- Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Jun 11; 149 (24): 1318-9.
AbstractA study on the quality of primary obstetric care in uncomplicated pregnancies carried out by means of a checklist revealed substandard factors in perinatal care in 71 out of 72 pregnancies. However there are many objections to the quality-control procedure. Some items on the original checklist had to be abandoned due to lack of evidence. In other items definitions and circumstances had not been properly considered and in some cases the patient's own wishes were responsible for a change in policy. The quality of the care delivered cannot be judged only by counting items on a checklist, but requires careful consideration of the situation and of the circumstances that led to the choices in perinatal care.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..