• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Jun 2003

    Myocardial viability twenty-four hours after orthotopic heart transplantation from non-heart-beating donors.

    • Juergen Martin, Georg Lutter, Christian Ihling, Matthias Siepe, Susanne Wagner, Jan Hilberath, Michael Kemper, Koppany Sarai, and Friedhelm Beyersdorf.
    • Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and the Institute of Pathological Anatomy, Albert-Ludwigs-University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany. Martin@ch11.ukl.uni-freiburg.de
    • J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2003 Jun 1; 125 (6): 1217-28.

    ObjectivesUsing a new preservation strategy, we investigated the performance of hearts from non-heart-beating donors during an observation period of 24 hours after orthotopic heart transplantation in a pig model.MethodsIn the control group (n = 6) beating donor hearts were harvested with Bretschneider's HTK solution and transplanted orthotopically without reperfusion modifications. In the non-heart-beating donor group (n = 6) hearts were perfused with leukocyte-depleted blood cardioplegia after 30 minutes of normothermic ischemia. Blood cardioplegia was supplemented with a sodium-hydrogen exchange inhibitor and adenosine. After transplantation, a second controlled reperfusion with blood cardioplegia was performed.ResultsPreload recruitable stroke work of the left ventricle 24 hours after transplantation in the control versus non-heart-beating donor group was 108% +/- 24% versus 103% +/- 18% of baseline values. Myocardial blood flow of the left and right ventricle was increased to 146% +/- 32% and 176% +/- 51% in the control group versus 176% +/- 29% and 194% +/- 27% in the non-heart-beating donor group. Myocardial oxygen consumption was 11.2 +/- 2.1 versus 12.8 +/- 2.2 mL/100 g per minute at baseline and 11.6 +/- 2.6 versus 13.2 +/- 3.1 mL/100 g per minute after 24 hours (not significant). Histologic examination with Luxol fast blue staining revealed that 2.6% +/- 4.8% of myocytes in the control group versus 1.8% +/- 1.9% in the non-heart-beating donor group were damaged irreversibly.ConclusionsRecovery of donor hearts from non-heart-beating donors is comparable with recovery of organs harvested from heart-beating donors if the above-mentioned preservation technique is used. These results could encourage the use of marginal donor hearts and help to expand the limited donor pool.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…