• Peng Na, Yang Mingzhi, Xinhua Yin, and Yong Chen.
• Department of the Fifth internal medicine, Thoracic Hospital of Hunan province, Changsha, Hunan.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 28; 100 (21): e26076e26076.

AbstractThere has been no ideal surgical approach for lumbar brucella spondylitis (LBS). This study aims to compare clinical efficacy and safety of posterior versus anterior approaches for the treatment of LBS.From April 2005 to January 2015, a total of 27 adult patients with lumbar brucella spondylitis were recruited in this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to surgical approaches. Thirteen cases in group A underwent 1-stage anterior debridement, fusion, and fixation, and 14 cases in group B underwent posterior debridement, bone graft, and fixation. The clinical and surgical outcomes were compared in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalizations, bony fusion time, complications, visual analog scale score, recovery of neurological function, deformity correction.Lumbar brucella spondylitis was cured, and the grafted bones were fused within 11 months in all cases. It was obviously that the operative time and intraoperative blood loss of group A were more than those of group B (P = .045, P = .009, respectively). Kyphotic deformity was signifcantly corrected in both groups after surgery; however, the correction rate was higher in group B than in group A (P = .043). There were no significant differences between the two groups in hospitalizations, bony fusion time, and visual analog scale score in the last follow-up (P = .055, P = .364, P = .125, respectively).Our results suggested that both anterior and posterior approaches can effectively cure lumbar brucella spondylitis. Nevertheless, posterior approach gives better kyphotic deformity correction, less surgical invasiveness, and less complications.Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

43 keywords...

hide…