• Nanna Maaløe, Ib Christian Bygbjerg, Rwakyendela Onesmo, Niels Jørgen Secher, and Bjarke Lund Sorensen.
• Department of International Health, Immunology, and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen, Denmark. nanna_maal@hotmail.com
• Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Sep 1; 91 (9): 1069-76.

ObjectiveTo investigate in depth to what extent indications for emergency cesarean sections followed evidence-based audit criteria for realistic best practice.DesignA quality assurance analysis based on a retrospective criterion-based audit.SettingTwo rural hospitals in Tanzania.PopulationFrom 2009, 400 cesarean section instances were investigated. Of these, 303 were emergency cesarean sections and therefore included.MethodsDocumented indications for and management preceding the emergency cesarean sections were compared with the audit criteria.Main Outcome MeasuresPrevalence of suboptimal care.ResultsOf the emergency sections, 26% appeared to be decided based on inappropriate indications, and in an additional 38%, the indications were unclear. Prolonged labor was the leading indication; in 36% of these, labor progressed timely and/or the membranes were still intact. In 26%, previous cesarean section was the indication, half of these with one previous section only. Fetal distress was an indication in 14%, but for 84% of these the fetal heart rate was either reassuring or not documented. For nine women, section was decided upon because of intrauterine fetal death; none had a trial of forceps/vacuum extraction or destructive surgery.ConclusionA considerable number of the audited emergency cesarean sections were performed on doubtful indications. In the light of the rising trend in global cesarean section rates, there seems to be a need to ensure quality of management preceding cesarean sections. This is particularly called for in rural sub-Saharan Africa where cesarean rates are still low and health risks of emergency surgery not negligible.© 2012 The Authors  Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica© 2012 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

26 keywords...

hide…