• Tatiana A Vogel, Pieter-Jan Coenraads, Laura M Bijkersma, Karin M Vermeulen, Marie-Louise A Schuttelaar, and EDEN Fragrance Study Group.
• Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
• Contact Derm. 2015 Jun 1; 72 (6): 355-61.

BackgroundThe prevalence of p-phenylenediamine (PPD) sensitization is 4% in the patch tested population and varies between zero and 1.5% in the general population. Hair dye is a recognised sensitization source.ObjectivesTo define the prevalence rates of PPD sensitization in the general and patch tested populations of The Netherlands, and to gain insights into relationships between patch test strength and exposure sources.MethodsPatch test database cases were matched with population-based controls. Analyses were performed based on demographic details, patch test reactions, and potential PPD exposure.ResultsPPD sensitization occurred in 3.3% of the patch tested population and in 1.3% of the general population. Hairdressers had a 4.4-fold increased chance of being sensitized to PPD (p = 0.041), and black henna tattoos showed a tendency for a 2.3-fold increased chance of sensitization (p = 0.081). Weak elicitation reactions were present in hairdressers and consumers. However, cases who had had black henna tattoos showed significantly more (extremely) strong patch test reactions upon elicitation (p = 0.015).ConclusionsThe prevalence rates in the patch tested and general population of The Netherlands are comparable with the prevalence rates of other mid-European centres. PPD sensitization is often attributed to hair dye. However, this study shows that subjects sensitized by black henna tattoos present with very severe elicitation reactions, emphasizing the need for more strict policing the prohibition.© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

34 keywords...

hide…