• Matthias Luger, Rainer Hochgatterer, Matthias C Klotz, Jakob Allerstorfer, Tobias Gotterbarm, and Bernhard Schauer.
• Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Krankenhausstrasse 9, 4020, Linz, Austria. Matthias.luger@kepleruniklinikum.at.
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 May 1; 142 (5): 871878871-878.

PurposeMinimally invasive surgery using short stems in total hip arthroplasty gained more popularity. The differences in change of hip offset and implant positioning in minimally invasive approaches are not fully known. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the difference in reconstruction of hip offset and implant positioning in direct anterior approach (DAA) and minimally invasive anterolateral approach (AL MIS).MethodsA single surgeon series of 117 hips (117 patients; mean age 65.54 years ± 11.47; index surgery 2014-2018) were included and allocated into two groups: group A (DAA) with 70 hips and Group B (AL MIS) with 47 patients operated. In both groups the same type of cementless curved short hip stem and press fit cup was used.ResultsBoth groups showed an equal statistically significant increase of femoral (p < 0.001) and decrease of acetabular offset (p < 0.001). Between both groups no statistically significant difference in offset reconstruction, leg length difference or implant positioning could be found. Leg length increased in both groups significantly and leg length discrepancy showed no difference (group A: - 0.06 mm; group B: 1.11 mm; p < 0.001). A comparable number of cups were positioned outside the target zone regarding cup anteversion.ConclusionThe usage of a curved short stem shows an equal reconstruction of femoro-acetabular offset, leg length and implant positioning in both MIS approaches. The results of this study show comparable results to the existing literature regarding change of offset and restoration of leg length. Malposition of the acetabular component regarding anteversion poses a risk.© 2021. The Author(s).

17 keywords...

hide…