• Thomas F Monaghan, Syed N Rahman, Christina W Agudelo, Alan J Wein, Jason M Lazar, Karel Everaert, and Roger R Dmochowski.
• Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
• Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 16; 57 (5).

AbstractSensitivity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a positive assignment out of all subjects who are actually positive for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly have the outcome of interest. Specificity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a negative assignment out of all subjects who are actually negative for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Positive predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a positive test result who truly have the outcome of interest. Negative predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a negative test result who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Sensitivity and specificity are inversely related, wherein one increases as the other decreases, but are generally considered stable for a given test, whereas positive and negative predictive values do inherently vary with pre-test probability (e.g., changes in population disease prevalence). This article will further detail the concepts of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values using a recent real-world example from the medical literature.

15 keywords...

hide…