• Albert Christersson, Johan Nysjö, Lars Berglund, Filip Malmberg, Ida-Maria Sintorn, Ingela Nyström, and Sune Larsson.
• Department of Orthopaedics, Uppsala University, S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. albert.christersson@akademiska.se.
• Skeletal Radiol. 2016 Jun 1; 45 (6): 763-9.

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to compare the reliability and agreement between a computer tomography-based method (CT) and digitalised 2D radiographs (XR) when measuring change in dorsal angulation over time in distal radius fractures.Materials And MethodsRadiographs from 33 distal radius fractures treated with external fixation were retrospectively analysed. All fractures had been examined using both XR and CT at six times over 6 months postoperatively. The changes in dorsal angulation between the first reference images and the following examinations in every patient were calculated from 133 follow-up measurements by two assessors and repeated at two different time points. The measurements were analysed using Bland-Altman plots, comparing intra- and inter-observer agreement within and between XR and CT.ResultsThe mean differences in intra- and inter-observer measurements for XR, CT, and between XR and CT were close to zero, implying equal validity. The average intra- and inter-observer limits of agreement for XR, CT, and between XR and CT were ± 4.4°, ± 1.9° and ± 6.8° respectively.ConclusionsFor scientific purpose, the reliability of XR seems unacceptably low when measuring changes in dorsal angulation in distal radius fractures, whereas the reliability for the semi-automatic CT-based method was higher and is therefore preferable when a more precise method is requested.

38 keywords...

hide…