-
- Matthew B Brothers, Matthew E Oster, Alexandra Ehrlich, Margaret J Strieper, and William T Mahle.
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia.
- Am. J. Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1; 113 (7): 1246-9.
AbstractElectrocardiography is often advocated as a screening tool in children for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). We sought to establish an electrocardiographic screening tool to identify children with HC. We hypothesized that a pediatric-specific electrocardiographic criterion would perform better than the popular criteria used for screening children for left ventricular hypertrophy and HC. The earliest available electrocardiogram for children (n=108) with HC (ages 7 to 21 yrs) was reviewed. We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 4 screening algorithms: (1) Sokolow-Lyon criterion (SV1+RV5/RV6>35 mm), (2) Cornell criterion (RaVL+SV3>28 mm in men, 20 mm in women), (3) total 12-lead voltage criterion (R wave to the nadir of Q/S wave>175 mm), and (4) pediatric-specific criterion (RaVL+SV2>23 mm). The same criteria were applied to a cohort of age-matched and gender-matched controls without cardiac disease. Statistically significant correlations were found between children with HC and positive screen using all 4 criteria. However, comparison of receiver operating characteristic demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.67 for Sokolow-Lyon criterion, 0.70 for Cornell criterion, 0.83 for total 12-lead criterion, and 0.82 for pediatric-specific criterion. Pediatric-specific criterion had superior sensitivity in gene-positive children and superior overall specificity than total 12-lead criterion. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the pediatric-specific criterion employing leads RaVL+SV2 is more accurate in identifying children with HC in comparison with other popular screening criteria.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.