• Nathan Johnson, John Faria, and Philomena Behar.
• Department of Otolaryngology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA nathanjohnson1010@gmail.com.
• Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Nov 1; 153 (5): 851-6.

ObjectiveTo compare the outcome of children with anterior epistaxis treated intraoperatively with either bipolar electrocautery or silver nitrate chemical cautery.Study DesignCase series with chart review.SettingTertiary-care pediatric otolaryngology practice.SubjectsChildren aged 2 to 18 years treated with either intraoperative bipolar electrocautery or silver nitrate chemical cautery of the anterior nasal septum for recurrent anterior epistaxis.MethodsAny reported bleeding event after surgery was recorded. The mean time from surgery to recurrent epistaxis was compared between groups.ResultsFifty patients underwent bipolar electrocautery, while 60 patients underwent silver nitrate chemical cautery. Within 2 years, 1 (2%) patient in the bipolar electrocautery group and 13 (22%) patients in the silver nitrate chemical cautery group had recurrent epistaxis (P = .003). Two years after treatment, there was no difference between treatment groups. Overall, 4 patients (8%) had recurrent epistaxis postoperatively in the bipolar electrocautery group at a mean of 4.34 years after treatment, while 17 (28.3%) patients recurred after a mean of 1.53 years of treatment in the silver nitrate chemical cautery group (P = .01).ConclusionCompared to those treated with chemical cautery, those treated with bipolar electrocautery had a longer nosebleed-free period and a lower incidence of recurrent epistaxis within 2 years of treatment. Beyond 2 years, the treatment methods are equivocal. Bipolar electrocautery may be a superior treatment in children who will not tolerate in-office chemical cautery, in those with a risk of severe bleeding, or when it can be combined with other operative procedures.© American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.

17 keywords...

hide…