• Heart Rhythm · Jun 2015

    Comparative Study

    Outcomes of Sprint Fidelis and Riata lead extraction: Data from 2 high-volume centers.

    • Mikhael F El-Chami, Faisal M Merchant, Mathew Levy, Mian Bilal Alam, Rohit Rattan, Michael H Hoskins, Jonathan J Langberg, David Delurgio, Michael S Lloyd, Angel R Leon, and Samir Saba.
    • Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology-Section of Electrophysiology, Emory University School of Medicine. Electronic address: melcham@emory.edu.
    • Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jun 1; 12 (6): 1216-20.

    BackgroundThe Sprint Fidelis (SF) and the Riata (RT) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads have been recalled for premature failure.ObjectiveData on SF and RT extractions are limited; therefore, we performed a pooled analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of lead extraction for the SF and RT lead families.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients undergoing transvenous extraction of SF and RT leads at Emory University and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from January 2007 to October 2013. Patients were placed into 2 groups based on the presence of an SF or RT lead. The primary endpoint was a major procedural complication, defined as death, need for urgent cardiac surgery, and hemopericardium or hemothorax that required an intervention.ResultsA total of 462 patients underwent extraction of recalled leads (SF, n = 360; RT, n = 102). The mean number of leads extracted in the RT group was higher than in the SF group (1.8 ± 0.9 vs 1.3 ± 0.7, P < .001), and there was a longer implantation time in the RT group (5.5 ± 2.5 vs 4.3 ± 2.0 years, P < .001). Complete procedural success was higher in the SF group (99.4% vs 96.1%, P =.024). Clinical success was similar (SF 99.4% vs RT 97.1%, P = .075). There were 6 major procedural complications in the entire cohort (1.3%). The rate of major complications was not different between the SF and RT groups (SF 1.1% vs RT 2.0%, P = .618). Total mortality was 0.65%, with no difference between the groupsConclusionOur data from 2 high-volume centers suggest that extraction of SF and RT leads is associated with excellent clinical success and a similar rate of major procedural complications.Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…