• Sebastian Q Vrouwe, Christopher H Pham, Raquel A Minasian, Haig A Yenikomshian, Warren L Garner, and T Justin Gillenwater.
• From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Southern California.
• Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Aug 1; 85 (2): 122-126.

IntroductionThere is an ongoing shortage of burn specialists, and workforce reports suggest possible hurdles attracting plastic surgeons into burn care. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the state of burn care in plastic surgery residency and (2) identify what barriers might exist for plastic surgeons pursuing a practice that involves burn care.MethodsSurveys were distributed to North American plastic surgery program directors and residents, respectively, during the 2018-2019 academic year.ResultsFifty-eight program directors (response, 54%) and 320 plastic surgery residents (response, 30%) participated. Burn care was felt to be an important component in training by most program directors (USA, 88%; Canada, 100%) and residents (USA, 87%; Canada, 99%). The majority of program directors included a burn unit rotation (USA, 88%; Canada, 90%). Rotations for integrated residents averaged 2.5 months and most commonly occurred during second year; independent residents spent 1.2 months on rotation, usually in first year. Three-quarters of American residents were interested in a career that involves burn care in some capacity, primarily burn reconstruction (40%). Factors that would discourage a trainee from practicing burn care in the future included the nature of burn care (60%) and burn operations (45%), the on-call commitment (39%), and a narrow scope of practice (38%).DiscussionThis study challenges the belief that plastic surgery trainees are disinterested in burn care. Burn surgery remains an important component of training programs, and we propose several steps to encourage greater interest and participation in the burn surgery workforce.

11 keywords...

hide…