-
Circ Cardiovasc Qual · Apr 2017
Comparative Study Observational StudySex-Specific Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.
- Ghanshyam Palamaner Subash Shantha, Prashant D Bhave, Saket Girotra, Denice Hodgson-Zingman, Alexander Mazur, Michael Giudici, Elizabeth Chrischilles, and Mary S Vaughan Sarrazin.
- From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (G.P.S.S., P.D.B., S.G., D.H.-Z., A.M., M.G.) and Department of Internal Medicine (M.S.V.S.), Roy and Lucille J. Carver College of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health (E.C.), University of Iowa, Iowa City; and Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation Center, Iowa City VA Medical Center, IA (M.S.V.S.).
- Circ Cardiovasc Qual. 2017 Apr 1; 10 (4).
BackgroundSex-specific comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is not known. Via this retrospective cohort study, we assessed the sex-specific, comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban and dabigatran), compared to each other and to warfarin among patients with atrial fibrillation.Methods And ResultsElderly (aged ≥66 years) Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Part D benefit plan from November 2011 to October 2013 with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation formed the study cohort (65 734 [44.8%] men and 81 137 [55.2%] women). Primary outcomes of inpatient admissions for ischemic strokes and major bleeding were compared across the 3 drugs (rivaroxaban: 20 mg QD, dabigatran: 150 mg BID, or warfarin) using 3-way propensity-matched samples. In men, rivaroxaban use decreased stroke risk when compared with warfarin use (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.99; P=0.048) and dabigatran use (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.96; P=0.029) and was associated with a similar risk of any major bleeding when compared with warfarin and dabigatran. In women, although ischemic stroke risk was similar in the 3 anticoagulant groups, rivaroxaban use significantly increased the risk for any major bleeding when compared with warfarin (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.42; P=0.021) and dabigatran (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.48; P=0.011).ConclusionsThe reduced risk of ischemic stroke in patients taking rivaroxaban, compared with dabigatran and warfarin, seems to be limited to men, whereas the higher risk of bleeding seems to be limited to women.© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.