• Enoch Ng, Xin Wang, Jonathan Keow, and Ju-Yoon Yoon.
• . enoch.ng@mail.utoronto.ca.
• Clin Invest Med. 2015 Feb 6; 38 (1): E1-E10.

PurposeThe Clinician Investigator Trainee Association of Canada/ Association des cliniciens-chercheurs en formation du Canada (CITAC/ACCFC) recently published the first survey to assess factors contributing to trainee satisfaction. One key finding is that increased level of mentorship strongly correlates with overall satisfaction; however, while 98% of respondents reported mentorship as important to success, more than 60% expressed some dissatisfaction with the mentorship received. To help address this discrepancy, we reviewed mentorship in academic medicine, focusing on clinician-investigator trainees, and distilled a set of recommendations for mentors, mentees and institutions.SourceOVID and manual curation based on the search terms 'mentorship' AND 'education, medical and research' identified 198 articles. Two authours independently reviewed both titles and abstracts and narrowed them down to 75 articles, based on relevance to mentorship in academic medicine. Consensus resulted in the selection of 19 articles for detailed review. Principal findings and Conclusion: Mentorship is beneficial at each training stage and is associated with greater research productivity, career retention and promotion. Nevertheless, more rigorous studies are needed, especially regarding cost-effectiveness. Studies have identified the characteristics of good mentors, including the ability to ensure open communication, ability to maintain confidentiality and ability to ensure that there is no mentor-mentee competition. Similarly, the characteristics of good mentees have been identified as the ability to take ownership of a project and the ability to build a network or team of mentors. The literature has also identified the actions that institutions can take to facilitate mentorship, which include mentor training and recognizing mentorship through awards.

5 keywords...

hide…