• Journal of allied health · Jan 2003

    Respiratory therapists' attitudes toward recredentialing.

    • Linda I Van Scoder.
    • Clarian Health and Affiliated Universities, 1701 N. Senate Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. lvanscoder@clarian.org
    • J Allied Health. 2003 Jan 1; 32 (1): 27-31.

    AbstractRecredentialing, sometimes referred to as recertification, is the process whereby people maintain their professional credentials by retesting or continuing education. The National Board for Respiratory Care has proposed mandatory recredentialing policies for respiratory therapists who receive a professional credential after July 1, 2002. The purpose of this study was to determine respiratory therapists' attitudes toward recredentialing. The author developed a survey instrument that was mailed to a systematic random sample of 1,000 subjects drawn from the active membership of the American Association for Respiratory Care. Data analysis consisted of frequencies, percentages, and measures of central tendency. Group means were compared using the independent groups t-test, with a significance level of p < or = 0.05. Of the surveys, 562 (56.2%) were returned. Of the 15 statements about recredentialing that were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, the respondents were most in agreement with "Proof of continuing education should be sufficient for recredentialing"; "There should be a way to determine whether a respiratory therapist is competent to practice"; and "I don't want to be required to recredential." In response to the multiple-choice question "Who should be in charge of assuring the continuing competency of respiratory therapists, the most frequently selected response was "Employers of respiratory therapists." Most respiratory therapists do not want to be required to recredential. If they are required to recredential, however, they prefer the use of contining education rather than retesting.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.