• Ryan Morgan, Douglas F Kauffman, Gerard Doherty, and Teviah Sachs.
• Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
• J Surg Educ. 2017 May 1; 74 (3): 415-422.

ObjectiveFor general surgery residents (Residents) to log an operation, the ACGME requires "significant involvement" in diagnosis (DX), operation selection (SEL), operation (OPR), preoperative (PRE), and postoperative (POC) care. We compared how residents and attending surgeons (Attendings) perceived residents' role in each of these core requirements.DesignResidents and attendings completed surveys postoperatively regarding responsibility for each core requirement on a 5-point Likert scale from "Completely Attending" to "Completely Resident." Significance was determined using Chi-square analysis (p < 0.05) and degree of agreement was calculated using Spearman's rank correlation (rs).SettingBoston Medical Center, Boston, MA (tertiary institution).ResultsA total of 302 paired surveys were analyzed. Residents more often performed a significant portion of the later stages of care (DX = 27%, PRE = 29%, SEL = 27%, OPR = 87%, and POC = 84%). Residents completed the majority of each requirement more frequently in operations performed in the acute setting compared to elective operations: DX (70% vs 8%, p < 0.01), PRE (74% vs 10%, p < 0.01), SEL (65% vs 11%, p < 0.01), OPR (100% vs 89%, p = 0.02), POC (100% vs 77%, p < 0.01). Resident participation was inversely related to operational complexity for DX (p < 0.01), PRE (p < 0.01), SEL (p < 0.01), and OPR (p = 0.01). Resident involvement in OPR increased at the end of the academic year (p = 0.05) and when working with junior attendings (<5 years in practice) (p = 0.01). Interpair agreement was greatest for DX (rs = 0.70) and lowest for POC (rs = 0.35). When residents and attendings did not agree in their answers, residents generally overstated their contribution to the DX (68%), PRE (58%), and SEL (64%) but understated their contribution in OPR (63%) and POC (62%).ConclusionsResidents and attendings demonstrated reliable agreement for most core requirements, but residents were often unable to be involved in all 5 core requirements. Resident involvement was weighted toward later stages of patient care, yet residents often underestimated their contributions. Operational acuity, complexity, and attending experience correlated with resident operative involvement.Copyright © 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

34 keywords...

hide…