• J Am Soc Echocardiogr · Oct 2000

    Comparative Study

    Superiority of 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular volume assessment in small piglet hearts.

    • M Abdullah, Y Maeno, J L Bigras, B W McCrindle, J F Smallhorn, and C Boutin.
    • Department of Paediatrics, Division of Cardiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
    • J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000 Oct 1; 13 (10): 918-23.

    AbstractTo evaluate the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography in the estimation of left ventricular (LV) volume in vivo, we studied 15 newborn piglets ranging in weight from 2.6 to 11.8 kg. Measurements of beating LV volumes by 3D echocardiograms were compared with measurements by conductance catheter and transthoracic 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiograms with the use of Simpson's rule. The results of both 3D and 2D echocardiograms correlated strongly with the actual volume (r = 0.98 and 0.95 for LV end-diastolic volume, and 0.998 and 0.95 for LV end-systolic volume, respectively). However, the standard error of estimate (SEE) for 2D echocardiography was larger than for 3D. The SEE values for LV end-diastolic volume for 2D and 3D echocardiograms were 2.30 mL and 1.85 mL, respectively, and 1.52 mL and 0.5 mL for LV end-systolic volume. We conclude that 3D echocardiography not only accurately measures LV volume and systolic function in a newborn heart, it is more precise than measurements from 2D echocardiography in the assessment of small beating hearts.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.