• Yingbo Zhang, Jinping Chen, Haiyang Xie, Kui Li, Ye Wang, Qian Chen, Cheng Jiang, Jiangtao He, and Nenggao Fu.
• Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, P.R. China.
• Exp Ther Med. 2021 Apr 1; 21 (4): 299.

AbstractThe aim of the study was to compare the application value of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). From January 2017 to July 2018, 108 LDH patients undergoing surgical treatment in our hospital were collected and divided into PTED group (treated with PTED, n=50) and MED group (treated with MED, n=58). The operation parameter index level, complications, recurrence and pain score (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale (JOA) were compared between the two groups. VAS, ODI and JOA scores of the two groups were significantly decreased after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Complications and recurrence of the two groups were similar (P>0.05). MED was superior to PTED in the number of intraoperative fluoroscopy and operation time, while PTED was superior to MED in intraoperative blood loss, incision length, length of hospital stay and bed rest time (P<0.05). Both PTED and MED can effectively treat LDH. Referring to clinical data, PTED may be the first choice for LDH treatment.Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

3 keywords...

hide…