-
Comparative Study
Comparative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccination in community-dwelling veterans.
- Diane M Richardson, Elina L Medvedeva, Christopher B Roberts, Darren R Linkin, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epicenter Program.
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
- Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015 Jul 15; 61 (2): 171-6.
BackgroundInfluenza is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. High-dose (HD) trivalent inactivated vaccine has increased immunogenicity in older adults compared with standard-dose (SD) vaccine. We assessed the relative effectiveness of HD influenza vaccination (vs SD influenza vaccination).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients who receive primary care at Veteran Health Administration (VHA) medical centers, and who received influenza vaccine in the 2010-2011 influenza season. The primary outcome was hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia. We also conducted an analysis in subgroups defined by age.ResultsWe evaluated 25 714 patients who received HD vaccine and 139 511 who received SD vaccine in 23 VHA medical centers. The rate of hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia was 0.3% in both groups in the influenza season. After accounting for patient characteristics in propensity-adjusted analyses, the risk of hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia was not significantly lower among patients receiving HD vaccine vs those receiving SD vaccine (risk ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, .68-1.40). In the subgroup of patients ≥85 years of age, receiving HD (compared with SD) vaccine was associated with lower rates of hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia.ConclusionsHD vaccine was not found to be more effective than SD vaccine in protecting against hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia; however, we found a protective effect in the oldest subgroup of patients. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of HD vaccine.Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2015. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.