• Sud. Med. Ekspert. · Mar 2008

    [Concerning the criteria of expert assessment of unfavorable outcomes in implantological stomatology].

    • T G Popova, E A Bazikian, G A Pashinian, A V Kamalian, and E Iu Kuraeva.
    • Sud. Med. Ekspert. 2008 Mar 1; 51 (2): 21-3.

    AbstractThe state of complex forensic-medical expertise in implantological stomatology was analyzed in the article. The questions of assessment of medical aid quality with the use of score system of risk degree and factors determination are considered. The authors suggest to use the score system of unfavorable outcomes with the purpose of objectification of expert conclusions.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…