• J Public Health Med · Mar 2001

    Trends in antibiotic prescribing and associated indications in primary care from 1993 to 1997.

    • M Frischer, H Heatlie, J Norwood, J Bashford, D Millson, and S Chapman.
    • Department of Medicines Management, Keele University. m.frischer@keele.ac.uk
    • J Public Health Med. 2001 Mar 1; 23 (1): 69-73.

    BackgroundRecent concerns that evidence on the appropriate use of antibiotics is not having an impact on prescribing trends are based on UK prescribing data relating to 1980-1991. The aim of this paper is to determine trends in antibiotic prescribing from 1993 to 1997 and link antibiotic prescriptions to diagnostic categories.MethodsA retrospective analysis of antibiotic prescriptions linked to diagnostic codes was carried out using the West Midlands General Practice Research Database.ResultsThe prescribing rate for antibiotics fell from 963 prescriptions/1,000 patients in 1993 to 807 prescriptions/1,000 patients in 1997 (p < 0.001). The proportion of antibiotic prescribing for respiratory conditions fell from 65 per cent in 1993 to 59 per cent in 1997 (p < 0.001). The main decreases in antibiotic prescribing are accounted for by non-specific lower respiratory tract infections (-22 prescriptions/1,000 patients), non-specific upper respiratory tract infections (-21/1,000 patients) and throat infections (-20/1,000 patients). There was increased prescribing for non-respiratory miscellaneous conditions (+6 prescriptions/1,000 patients).ConclusionsOverall antibiotic prescribing declined by 16 per cent between 1993 and 1997, primarily for respiratory conditions. These results of the current study are in marked contrast to an earlier review, which found an increase of 46 per cent between 1980 and 1991 in England. The level of antibiotic prescribing for conditions which may not be bacterial in origin is still high and there is scope for further reductions in antibiotic prescribing. This study highlights the need for regular epidemiological data to inform the debate on antibiotic prescribing.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…